September 6, 2026 · 1:22 pm

Whistler: I Loved It

Did I love Ann Patchett’s Whistler for the book itself or for the experience of reading it? Hard to say. It’s been so long since I’ve read a book in deep immersion. You can blame the pandemic, or parenting, or divorce, or the interet, or the deterioration of all our attention spans wrought by smartphones or all of the above, but long gone are the easy days of picking up a novel and just… reading it until it ends. Now I read in fragmented chunks of a chapter at breakfast, a few pages before passing out asleep, a few pages when I sit myself down and firmly insist I Am Going To Relax And Read.

Cue bringing Whistler on a six day canoe trip. Here, I thought, will be where I read. And for the first four days I had the same problem as at home, only here the distractions were the need to hang bags in trees to keep them from the bears or the pure exhaustion of having portaged for 75km. Until the fourth day when we were spoiled with only two hours of paddling and arrived at a site where I could hang my hammock and just… read. And guys, I read that book and was immersed in it and time disappeared and everything was bliss.

You knew there was going to be an Until.

Until the book itself failed me. Oh but it’s perfection in narration – story telling at its best with funny and full characters that make their truth known in small actions and perfect dialogue. A plot that understands its scope – girl reunites with long forgotten third step father and recalls and then explores a trauma they shared alongside revisiting and reinterpreting family dynamics and forging new ones – and executes with brilliant pacing. Terrific writing that is neither showy nor wasted.

*spoilers ahead

But then Patchette can’t seem to clinch it. Unwilling, I guess, to kill Eddie *which BY THE WAY the only time I stopped reading was to take a break to tend to the fire because I knew (or thought I knew) that Eddie was about to die and I couldn’t accept it and didn’t want to. Oh there’s an elegant and literary way of explaining this ending – the precision of knowing ‘when to stop,’ and the genius of exploiting the core theme that we are all writing our own stories, we are all deciding at any given moment what part of our story matters to ourselves and to others and what to do with the stories we tell ourselves about ourselves and other people (I am not kidding, the theme here is brilliantly done and stays with you) but it felt like such a cop-out, like an unwilligness to give this reader what she yearned for: a big cathartic cry on a hammock overlooking an Alogonquin lake lol

Alas, I was left to imagine my own ending – and if I were in a book club that read a book we could talk about it. For now, maybe you tell me: what was it like to read this one? what did you make of the ending?

Yours in the temporary bliss of deep reading. And here’s hoping this sets the pattern by reminding me of the exquisite joy of being in a great book.

Leave a comment

Filed under Erin's Favourite Books, Fiction, Prize Winner

Tagged as , , , , , , ,

September 6, 2026 · 12:54 pm

Land: Bor-ing (tell me I’m wrong)

You have seen Maggie O’Farrell’s Land. It is front and center on display tables and people are talking about it. Her first book, Hamnet, was a big deal and so this next book was bound to generate attention. Only problem is, at least in my opinion (and isn’t that why you’re reading this) Land is overhyped boring.

Oh the book starts out with promise. The writing is – really – extraordinarily beautiful. Subtle, specific and aching. I am for sure recommending you do not read this book the whole way through but you should read the first 50 pages for the pure enjoyment of the prose. And the plot from the opening is similarly promising: we’re in 19th century Ireland and a boy and his father are out making a map, strange circumstances in the forest and the father goes mad. All kinds of questions surface: what caused the madness? what will happen to the family given the precarity of their existence without the father’s income?

If only these were questions that could sustain 500 pages OR if only these questions were further complicated. Alas. What then follows is a sort of generational history of the plot of land and the people who had lived there. Which I regret to inform you does not constitute an interesting plot. Yes, of course, each family or person who lived on the land has unique stories and yes, of course, the book aims to remind the reader of the richness in history and longevity of the natural world that we so boldly claim to own or occupy. And in the case of Land the history of the land holds those of great acts of cruelty and suffering – including a lot about the Great Famine that I didn’t know and legit found interesting/haunting. However. You may be eager to read a genealogy of a place and if that’s the case you might well enjoy Land. If you are expecting something where characters develop or Things Happen you best look elsewhere. This is a novel that took the idea of ‘setting’ and ‘literary devices’ just… didn’t bother to sketch out how the rest of the elements of fiction might need to come into play.

I’m sure I’m wrong – I have to be because everyone else seems to love this book – so tell me why and how.

Leave a comment

Filed under Fiction, Worst Books

Tagged as , , , , , , , ,

September 1, 2026 · 4:53 pm

Go Gentle: I guess you do need a man

I was thrilled on starting Maria Semple’s Go Gentle to see an idea C. and I have bandied about for year – a ‘coven’ of women looking after one another – made literal. Adora, our protagonist, has cultivated an apartment building full of independent women who are committed to living their fully-realized, independent lives, while also looking out for one another (as they are and as they age). Here it is, I thought, the expression of every adult woman’s secret fantasy of a life led where the countertop is clean and self-actualization has come from a sense of worthiness owed only to existence rather than… anything or anyone else.

I suppose I should have been warier on reading the glaring plot hole that is Adora’s financially successful career as a… consulting philosopher. Cue the legit lol. But yes, of course, the extremely wealthy family (or AI company) must have a philosopher on staff to advise on the moral questions of the day. But of course.

And you know, Adora’s particular brand of Stoic self-discipline will find cultural resonance. And the plot – such as it is – invites some delightful romps through art heists and FBI raids and descriptions of billionaire mansions that we all just love to read.

There’s a not unserious section on the #metoo moment of Adora being sexually assaulted on the job and signing the NDA and taking the hush money. And were it not for the absolutely incongruous idea of Adora as a comedy writer turned Stoic philosopher (which, okay, in itself isn’t an unbelievable change, just that the novel does not offer Any Accounting for This Character Development) the section might have offered something more than a bizarre sense that this was what the book was meant to be ‘about’ and that this was ‘serious stuff’.

Only then do we land on the romance. The kind where Adora is finally – finally – complete. Because she finds a man. A man who gets her and always has and with whom she can be fully herself. And barf gag barf. Oh it’s hard. As someone who now has a partner with whom I finally and can fully be myself I don’t mean to downplay the Yes! of discovering that there is another person with whom you can love and be loved. It *is both a surprise and a joy. But it is also not the prerequisite for connection and joy. And in another book, I’d be all for this kind of celebratory character arc. But come onnnnn: in a book that opens with the promise of connection in and through women-caring-for-women to end with a woman-saved-by-the-love-of-a-man… just… ugh.

Oh and I know you’ll tell me that Adora continues to express herself as an independent woman simply “augmented” by this love. Where ‘giving in’ to love is in the titular expression “going gentle” in lieu, I suppose of a feminist “rage” that insists on independence and contemplates the idea that community might be All By Itself a worthy construct for meaning. Lol lol. And you’re right, that’s what the book tries to sell us in its closing. AND YET if ever the marketing pitch team for hetero-monogamy* is in search of a sell-piece, I offer you Go Gentle.

Leave a comment

Filed under Worst Books

Tagged as , , , , , ,

August 18, 2026 · 12:53 am

London Falling: Good, good, very good

Patrick Radden Keefe’s books read the way I like non-fiction to read: like fiction. True of London Falling, too, where we follow the life and death of Zac Brettler and the web of people wrapped up in his mysterious death. It’s an astonishing read for the depth of the research (reporting? I’m not sure the difference) and the way Keefe manages to bring depth in history/biography to full families in ways that make the subsequent choices these people make feel consequential and reaching.

I don’t want to give too much away because it is something of a mystery in its unfolding, but I’ll say that there are a few spots where the characters get a bit thick in their backstory and you have to Pay Attention, as well as some moments where I lost a bit of the sharper focus on the way Brettler’s death was meant to be both particular and standing in for the whole (synecdoche, right?) and instead got lost in the weeds of his very particular – and poignant – story.

Strong recommend on this one – enjoy (as much as you can the story of a dead 19 year old).

Leave a comment

Filed under New York Times Notable, Non-fiction, Prize Winner

Tagged as , ,