Category Archives: Prize Winner

Whistler: I Loved It

Did I love Ann Patchett’s Whistler for the book itself or for the experience of reading it? Hard to say. It’s been so long since I’ve read a book in deep immersion. You can blame the pandemic, or parenting, or divorce, or the interet, or the deterioration of all our attention spans wrought by smartphones or all of the above, but long gone are the easy days of picking up a novel and just… reading it until it ends. Now I read in fragmented chunks of a chapter at breakfast, a few pages before passing out asleep, a few pages when I sit myself down and firmly insist I Am Going To Relax And Read.

Cue bringing Whistler on a six day canoe trip. Here, I thought, will be where I read. And for the first four days I had the same problem as at home, only here the distractions were the need to hang bags in trees to keep them from the bears or the pure exhaustion of having portaged for 75km. Until the fourth day when we were spoiled with only two hours of paddling and arrived at a site where I could hang my hammock and just… read. And guys, I read that book and was immersed in it and time disappeared and everything was bliss.

You knew there was going to be an Until.

Until the book itself failed me. Oh but it’s perfection in narration – story telling at its best with funny and full characters that make their truth known in small actions and perfect dialogue. A plot that understands its scope – girl reunites with long forgotten third step father and recalls and then explores a trauma they shared alongside revisiting and reinterpreting family dynamics and forging new ones – and executes with brilliant pacing. Terrific writing that is neither showy nor wasted.

*spoilers ahead

But then Patchette can’t seem to clinch it. Unwilling, I guess, to kill Eddie *which BY THE WAY the only time I stopped reading was to take a break to tend to the fire because I knew (or thought I knew) that Eddie was about to die and I couldn’t accept it and didn’t want to. Oh there’s an elegant and literary way of explaining this ending – the precision of knowing ‘when to stop,’ and the genius of exploiting the core theme that we are all writing our own stories, we are all deciding at any given moment what part of our story matters to ourselves and to others and what to do with the stories we tell ourselves about ourselves and other people (I am not kidding, the theme here is brilliantly done and stays with you) but it felt like such a cop-out, like an unwilligness to give this reader what she yearned for: a big cathartic cry on a hammock overlooking an Alogonquin lake lol

Alas, I was left to imagine my own ending – and if I were in a book club that read a book we could talk about it. For now, maybe you tell me: what was it like to read this one? what did you make of the ending?

Yours in the temporary bliss of deep reading. And here’s hoping this sets the pattern by reminding me of the exquisite joy of being in a great book.

Leave a comment

Filed under Erin's Favourite Books, Fiction, Prize Winner

London Falling: Good, good, very good

Patrick Radden Keefe’s books read the way I like non-fiction to read: like fiction. True of London Falling, too, where we follow the life and death of Zac Brettler and the web of people wrapped up in his mysterious death. It’s an astonishing read for the depth of the research (reporting? I’m not sure the difference) and the way Keefe manages to bring depth in history/biography to full families in ways that make the subsequent choices these people make feel consequential and reaching.

I don’t want to give too much away because it is something of a mystery in its unfolding, but I’ll say that there are a few spots where the characters get a bit thick in their backstory and you have to Pay Attention, as well as some moments where I lost a bit of the sharper focus on the way Brettler’s death was meant to be both particular and standing in for the whole (synecdoche, right?) and instead got lost in the weeds of his very particular – and poignant – story.

Strong recommend on this one – enjoy (as much as you can the story of a dead 19 year old).

Leave a comment

Filed under New York Times Notable, Non-fiction, Prize Winner

One Day, Everyone Will Have Been Against This

It’s hard for me to write about Omar El Akkad’s One Day, Everyone Will Have Been Against This. Without Getting Into It there’s a lot for me wrapped up in how individuals could and have responded to the ongoing genocide in Gaza – along with our collective obligations to do anything/more.

So with that – here’s what I offer: The memoir follows El Akkad’s life in journalism and his coverage of the genocide in Gaza and his righteous sense that too much of the west is ready to ignore that genocide – and all the ways media and government work to reinforce the individual effort to Not Know (and how that Not Knowing is really about not jeopardizing any of the power and comfort we have). El Akkad asks the reader not only how they are benefiting from their indifference or inaction, but also calls on the reader to do more, well really, to do anything.

It’s a powerful book and one you should read, and then one to take with you as you think about what you are doing, or not doing, and why in response to the continued genocide.

1 Comment

Filed under Bestseller, Non-fiction, Prize Winner

Buckeye: Neighbours making neighbourhoods

Truly as I sat down to write this I got a text from a neighbour and friend who is looking after my garden while I’m away and took out my garbage bins and generally is great for helping give care. These are neighbours who also – thank god – send their children unaccompanied to the park with mine and cultivate the kind of interdependent independence that childhood thrives on – a kind of freedom that parents using GPS tracking watches and hyper-surveillance of children find suspect.

It’s a weird, and very small thread of Patrick Ryan’s Buckeye to attach to, but I was – am – so glad for the way the kids in this book grow up free to roam on bikes and until the streetlights come on and with many, many other children such that they create and cultivate micro communities of relationships. And glad that my kids have tiny opportunities for this, too.

Okay, that’s not really what this book is about and is more about when it is about – following the generation of youth who fight in and live after WWII the book explores how their childhood is shaped by their damaged or absent veteran fathers, then by their own experience fighting, and then watching their own children conscripted for Vietnam. Of course I knew this was a generation that moved through these global conflicts – but following it through the microcosm of two families – two deeply and surprisingly intertwined families – made the permeation of those conflicts into the character of individuals and their world more tangible.

It is also a book about how the mores of the time shaped sexuality and its expression, gender roles, race (ish – this is a rather lightly treated theme and pretty reduced to extremes and headlines) and (barely) class.

These pieces of ‘the times’ also inform how the characters make or don’t make their choices.

[Aside: I got distracted and called away from finishing this post and here it is a month later and I’m doing my best to recall what else I wanted to say about the book But]

One choice – or the same choice made over and over again – centers the book. How a choice for (or against) fidelity to a spouse cascades across a life; how a choice for (or against) the truth (and what exactly is the truth – is it not lying or is it proactive honesty?) explodes relationships and alters lives; how (beyond the individual) choices of global politics made (again and again) find new and familiar patterns.

I enjoyed the book, but if my, now several weeks later impression, holds, its not one that will shatter or shake you. Just a pleasant one for a cottage or a beach or – as the waning days of summer arrive – to read in half hour snippets before collapsing to sleep. Like a well told story of the realist variety where the writing is good but not distractingly good, where the characters are interesting and have an arc but are not people you spend any time outside the book thinking about, and where the plot is one you could describe over the table at a trivia night and everyone would agree that sounds interesting but is not, in the end, that interesting. It is a fine book.

Leave a comment

Filed under American literature, Book I'll Forget I Read, Fiction, Prize Winner