Category Archives: Fiction

Salmon Fishing in the Yemen: Sweet

    Salmon Fishing in the Yemen is very sweet. It’s got a light hearted plot (UK fisheries scientist is hired by a billionaire sheik to introduce salmon fishing to the Yemen), sympathetic characters and an entirely undemanding set of thematic questions. Reading is is the equivalent to drinking a hot tea after a rainy day: soothing, heart warming and altogether unexciting.

I’d not recommend Salmon Fishing because it doesn’t offer you anything fresh – the characters are all familiar, their concerns pretty standard. Sure the plot is a bit quirky, but it’s a sort of quirk-for-the-sake-of-sweetness that reminds me of young women who wear quirky mittens (me) or people who cultivate quirky habits like only ever wearing odd socks (M.). I grant that the form – a series of diary entries, transcripts, letters, interviews – lends a certain novelty to the narrative form, but it’s nothing we haven’t read before and doesn’t offer enough to make it anything other than another sweet quirk.

And so there you go. A sweet read for this still-receptive-to-the-sentimental reader.

Leave a comment

Filed under Book I'll Forget I Read, Fiction

The Sense of an Ending: Near Perfect, but for the… ending

       Julian Barnes gets it so right in “The Sense of an Ending.” The novel(la) asks and attempts an answer at questions of how we remember our own histories, what makes for an exceptional life, and how we can reconcile the story we tell ourselves about who we are now with the “evidence” of our past actions and beliefs.

Our protagonist spends the first half of the novel narrating a pivotal experience from his adolescence/young adulthood – narrating it with a self-conscious awareness that his narration can only ever be partial and biased (but not an overly obsessive or intrusive self-consciousness, rather the gentle thematic reminders that history and memory might claim to rely on evidence and testimony, but in the end are only ever versions based on ever-shifting “facts”). The second half of the novel narrates how our protagonist must revisit and revise his version of his history, his memories, after new information – new “facts” – come to his attention. This attempt a revision, or attempt at reconciling long held memories with “realities” of the past, or contrasting memories, all result in the “sense” of an ending – the illusion of a conclusion, the ethereal trace of something like resolution, when in fact all we know at the end of the book is how incomplete, how false the certainty of a memory, how inadequate our capacities for recollection.

And this is my only quibble with the book – otherwise I really did find it to be exceptional – is that the ending that we’re given to the narrative reads as too dramatic, *too* showy, and its unnecessary. The brilliance of the book until that point is the banality of the events, the quotidian dramas that make the protagonist so brilliantly human and allowed this reader to so clearly empathize. Which is not to say that I’d do away with the climatic unpacking of the tangled threads of memory and actual experience, but rather I’d have appreciated a slightly less punchy actual experience – in other words, the climatic drama did not need to be so dramatic. Should not have been, actually, as it took away from the subtlety of the thematic exploration of what we can and what we pretend to know about our past and about our selves.

And as an individual with what I like to call a “partial memory,” or an “episodic memory” — I do not have a memory that allows for either sequence or certainty. I forget conversations, experiences, interactions and remember only brief moments, emotional impressions and that which a photograph prompts — I found this book a refreshing reminder that I am not so different from those who have “normal” memories/memory faculties – in that while those people might imagine a sure-r narrative and may be able to more convincingly recall their stories to themselves, they are, in the end, all but stories. And so perhaps my fixation with the historical and the fictional, with that which exists in the space between fact and imagination, has most to do with this – with my understanding of my own mnemonic incompleteness and my fantasy that I am missing out on a plenitude others experience. Julian Barnes reminded me that what I (imagine I) miss out on might just be the experience of memory for all of us, and that the certainty we imagine is just a sense, just a trace, that we use to account for our lives in a way that allows ourselves a story about the kind of person we are (or wish we were) and a story we mix up as true.

1 Comment

Filed under British literature, Erin's Favourite Books, Fiction

Cloud Atlas

Away for work with no laptop, and so a proper post is impossible at the moment, but I wanted to get down a few thoughts about David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas before I forget (for those counting I only have one Mitchell novel left, which I may save for the day i recognize as the worst day of my life so that I might have something to live for/look forward to. He is so. Brilliant. I like just knowing there is
more of his genius for me to discover. that promise (both the potential and the guarantee) – withheld – makes my life more livable).

I want to remember the form – a mess of genres, narrative points of view and forms. The theme of servitude: to ideals, people, corporations, history (but not love). The idea of ascension – that we (people, characters) might be evolving in a way that keeps us the same even while we strive to be/do better. The idea of reliance, that if we are to make it/survive it will only be after trusting in someone else, knowing we will be betrayed, but in the time before betrayal that we might make/do something great or lasting. That we lose ourselves in moments of beauty – that in reading this book we find ourselves presented with one such moment – a space to forget the petty, insular problems of a particular time and place, and transcend form, genre, and *self* in a way that allows the briefest recognition of beauty. That is what the characters do, and that is what Mitchell offers his readers. And we rely on him to take us somewhere higher then we had been before. And he, unlike his characters, doesn’t betray that faith, but really did leave this reader with a greater expectation for what is beautiful, for what great art can do.

Leave a comment

Filed under Booker Prize, British literature, Erin's Favourite Books, Fiction, Prize Winner

A Clash of Kings: Winter is Coming

                  Twice in ten pages George R R Martin compared slicing a throat to cutting a soft cheese. So I’m not going to tell you that the writing in the Song of Ice and Fire series is inspired, but the plot is compelling enough. Just compelling enough in this, the second book of the series. I found it slow to get going – something like 300 pages were spent recapping the events of the first book – and slower still to reach anything approximating a climax. I suppose that as the second book in a yet unfinished series you can’t have all the big events take place at once, but all the same I could have handled a little more urgency. I will blame the less then captivating plot for taking something like three weeks to read it. I also have this little thing of a cross-country move going on. I expect that took up some mental time, so it’s not all GRRM’s fault. And this isn’t a blog about Blame, so…

I’m not sure how I feel about Bran – as a character I expect we readers are meant to feel sympathy for his plight as a non-walking, non-climbing would-be knight, and then to feel triumphant for him when he discovers his wolf-ish powers, but I for one find his whining tone to be just this side of annoying. Especially in contrast to his sister Arya who has her own share of terrible shit to deal with, but does so with a certain determination and a willingness to be depressed about how EVERYTHING has gone wrong but to still Be Strong. This mantra that underpins the actions and thoughts of the Stark children – Be Strong – sometimes reads as a bit self-help, but usually reads as a sort of inspiring mantra that could bear repeating in an era of cynicism and skepticism towards anything optimistic or sincere. This reader simultaneously wanted to say ‘oh come on, get on with it,’ and to also say, ‘yeah. BE strong.’ In this sense I suppose the novel gets at this reader’s hesitancy to believe in, accept or acknowledge the virtues the Starks are meant to embody – of honesty, integrity, strength – all the while earnestly (and secretly) yearning for a return to these values. Is this what fantasy is all about? Allowing readers to indulge in a nostalgic time of sincerity while squaring that sincerity with a world that demands irony?

So I’ll keep going with the series after reading a few other things. I could use a break from the sometimes plodding pace, the unwieldy cast of characters and the bleakness of a world preparing for perpetual winter (though the winter where I am is decidedly absent) and the baseness of humanity propagated by war. I am curious to see how the magical elements are taken up in later books. And curious, too, I suppose about whether Honour is eventually rewarded with something other then betrayal, death, or magic-lady-smoke-baby-attack.

Leave a comment

Filed under American literature, Uncategorized