Category Archives: National Book Award

Let Us Descend

I can’t place what I didn’t love about Jesmyn Ward’s Let Us Descend but it was something about an uncertainty of what would be/was the trajectory of Annis’s story. Which makes sense, I know, in a book of slavery and the experience of uncertainty and alienation for those enslaved. And maybe love of a book focused on the slave experience is the wrong aspiration – something closer to appreciation and awe for the brilliant writing, the evocative and rich descriptions, the pacing and poetry.

The novel focuses on Annis and her journey of enslavement from a time with her mother to a slave market to a sugar plantation and beyond. The physical journey is marked by spirits and hauntings that make manifest (or as manifest as a ghost can be) the intergenerational trauma of slavery and violence – and the ways resilience come from the stories we have been told and tell ourselves. I suppose my uncertainty about what the novel was going to be about (like it felt like I kept waiting for the plot to begin? or the core conflict to be made clear?) misunderstands that the story is one of survival – and that the meaningful trajectory of experiencing endless uncertainty of place, people and threatened and real violence – and when and how we can claim autonomy and community amid the most abject dehumanized moments – is itself the life of Annis and the plot we are meant to follow.

So in this instance I think the problem was me as a reader – expecting or wanting something different from the story – while the book itself is an expertly crafted, compact gem.

Leave a comment

Filed under American literature, Fiction, National Book Award, Prize Winner

All Fours: I don’t know what to tell you. It’s either very good or I can’t tell because of all 18+ content

My mum was not wrong when she told me Miranda July’s All Fours was ‘very graphic’ and ‘shocking.’ She was kind enough to suggest that someone of my generation might not be as scandalized, but honestly? It was pretty graphic – pushing the bounds of vulgar. I guess to see where the line is between vulgar and beautiful?

And maybe someone of my generation was even more scandalized because boy does it make menopause look like A Ride I Would Rather Not Take.

So backing up: unnamed protagonist heads out on a road trip she doesn’t really want to take because she wants to prove to herself (and her husband and friends) that she is the kind of person who wants to take a road trip. She makes it half an hour outside the city before camping out in a motel for three weeks.

I have to admire her resolve to abandon any pretence with herself. She knows she’s not going to leave the motel – having fallen (in the weirdest possible way) totally in love with this random man, Davey, that she locks eyes with in a gas station parking lot. A series of further weirdness follows including a 20K redecoration of the motel room orchestrated by Davey’s wife. A scene with a tampon that will live forever etched in my mind.

And then suddenly it got pretty boring. She gets back from her road trip and is very sad about no-more Davey, and very sad about getting old and eventually dying, and being in perimenopause, and boy did I lose interest. Not that I was hooked for the vulgarity, but more for the weirdness, the out of place and timeness. And back in LA and in her regular life it was just… not as compelling. And drawn out with the angst.

Anyway, she ends up in a functional open marriage with her genderless child living on the profits of her art, so you know, really leaning in to the typical reader’s experience.

All that said there are some spectacular scenes of dancing. For those of you persuaded dancing is a spiritual activity – and I know there are plenty of you – the novel has some very moving scenes of the connection dance allows. Said by one extremely bad and energetic dancer.

Oh it does have extraordinary good writing.

Should you read it? I don’t know? Maybe? Probably so you can be hip and pretend like you weren’t floored by the scene X Y and Z – all extreme and all intense. Actually that’s a good enough reason – read it because rare to find a book that makes you feel this much, even (especially?) when that feeling is surprise, disgust, desire, lust, shock – all from reading! Books, man. They are something else.

Leave a comment

Filed under Fiction, National Book Award

Home: Slow and beautiful

I have tried a couple of times to read Marilynne Robinson’s Gilead but each time gave up with boredom (despite it being routinely included on best-of-all-time lists). So what made me think I’d fine the second book set in the town of Gilead and focused on religion to be more captivating, I’m not sure. But I was! More captivated that is. Still not going to run away with any prizes for being enthralling or Utterly Engrossing, but definitely a winner here in the slow burn of character development and theme.

The book follows Jack and Glory, siblings returned home to care for their dying father – a retired minister. I guess Jack didn’t really come home to care for him, or Glory either, both sort of find their lives falling apart and return home, conveniently to care for the dying dad. For Jack it’s a return after a long exile/absence and for his father this is something of a chance to redeem Jack (who’s soul he has been Very Worried About).

Unfolding over many scenes of making tea, or standing in a garden, or rocking on a porch bench, Glory and Jack reconnect and cautiously share and build trust. It asks readers to figure out where the limit of familial bond might be, how we carry/negotiate/give up/fail/rebuild familial expectations, and when – if ever – we might be allowed to start our lives again when they Go Wrong.

If you are tired, sleepy, exhausted, even a bit likely to doze, I’d say make this a Morning Book as you will almost certainly fall asleep within a paragraph as the lyrical writing and slowwww pace are very… lulling. But if you’ve got your 8 hours and a cup of coffee, you could do much worse for a book to read and contemplate What It All Means.

Leave a comment

Filed under American literature, Book I'll Forget I Read, Fiction, National Book Award, Orange Prize, Prize Winner

Real Life: It’s (not) fine.

Brandon Taylor’s Real Life follows Wallace as he tries to decide whether to stay – in life, in his graduate program, in relationships – and while he wanders grief for his dead father. A grief that lurks but that Wallace insists – over and over – is fine. It’s all fine. And while I’m still not sure what Wallace wants (out of life, out of his sexual/friendship/relationship with Miller, from his friends) or that Wallace knows.

What Wallace does know is that being a gay, black man (the first black graduate student in something like thirty years in his program) is an exercise in indignities – the small and the grotesque – and that each time he waits for his white friends to Do Something and they Do Not he is never surprised, but again disappointed.

Taking place over the course of a weekend, the narrative packs in so much in the compressed time, a case study of ‘show don’t tell’ where we learn so much from the small and subtle moments, and come to want for Wallace anything other than where he is, but like him, can also hardly imagine what else he will do.

It is beautiful, wrenching writing. And maybe a little bit hopeful in the way it imagines that maybe friendship and connection can improve (not just improve something for Wallace, but just as a thing-itself improve).

And yet novels have no obligation to be uplifting (this is not a kid’s climate change book that ends with how you can help the planet! in! five! easy! steps!). It isn’t fine. None of it is fine. Except maybe the novel itself, which is excellent.

Leave a comment

Filed under Fiction, National Book Award, New York Times Notable, Prize Winner