Category Archives: Prize Winner

North Woods: Do you believe in ghosts.

It’s an odd time to be Canadian and reading a deeply American novel. Is there such a thing as reading patriotically? Even when you’re someone who feels discomfited by nationalism and patriotism? I suppose there must be if my reading of Daniel Mason’s North Woods is to be believed.

The book itself – held apart from reading it in Ontario in 2025 – is beautifully written. The kind of thing where you admire the writing as art and pause at particularly striking descriptions and are moved.

And then the story – or many stories, I guess – is one of all the lives that pass through a particular patch of forest and a house built there in the New England woods. Each chapter offers a new moment in time and new lives led there (sometimes the decedents of previous owners, sometimes newly ‘discovering’ the house and its forest). While each chapter brings a selection of plot and affect (ambition, murder, betrayal, madness, grief) the thematic question of *what endures* persists both bubbling below the surface and explicitly called up in the form of ghosts, found artefacts, bones and hallucinations.

It’s an American novel for its geography, to be sure, but also for this fascination in legacy and ambition – of conquering and taming the land (though the land has something to say about that) and ownership and triumph. So you can know that going into it and read it alongside whatever feels you may have about that nationalist aspiration.

And you can also read it as an ecological narrative of land and nature having a much, much more expansive sense of time and scale. Where the house crumbles, where the sharp focus of one life that we intimately explore in a chapter is literally and figuratively subsumed under layers of dirt, where the trees persistently enclose and crowd out the human. And while their are moments in reading that this expansive sense of time and natural power reads as (unexpectedly, perhaps) claustrophobic, for the most part this reader found it entirely hopeful. Perhaps its the Unitarian in me that believes in that interconnected web of all living things less troubled by the smallness of one life and more optimistic in the eventual and inevitable dissolution of the one life into the natural whole. Or perhaps this is what the book best offers: you are small, your time is small, and yet all still vivid and worthy.

Leave a comment

Filed under American literature, Fiction, New York Times Notable, Prize Winner

All Fours: I don’t know what to tell you. It’s either very good or I can’t tell because of all 18+ content

My mum was not wrong when she told me Miranda July’s All Fours was ‘very graphic’ and ‘shocking.’ She was kind enough to suggest that someone of my generation might not be as scandalized, but honestly? It was pretty graphic – pushing the bounds of vulgar. I guess to see where the line is between vulgar and beautiful?

And maybe someone of my generation was even more scandalized because boy does it make menopause look like A Ride I Would Rather Not Take.

So backing up: unnamed protagonist heads out on a road trip she doesn’t really want to take because she wants to prove to herself (and her husband and friends) that she is the kind of person who wants to take a road trip. She makes it half an hour outside the city before camping out in a motel for three weeks.

I have to admire her resolve to abandon any pretence with herself. She knows she’s not going to leave the motel – having fallen (in the weirdest possible way) totally in love with this random man, Davey, that she locks eyes with in a gas station parking lot. A series of further weirdness follows including a 20K redecoration of the motel room orchestrated by Davey’s wife. A scene with a tampon that will live forever etched in my mind.

And then suddenly it got pretty boring. She gets back from her road trip and is very sad about no-more Davey, and very sad about getting old and eventually dying, and being in perimenopause, and boy did I lose interest. Not that I was hooked for the vulgarity, but more for the weirdness, the out of place and timeness. And back in LA and in her regular life it was just… not as compelling. And drawn out with the angst.

Anyway, she ends up in a functional open marriage with her genderless child living on the profits of her art, so you know, really leaning in to the typical reader’s experience.

All that said there are some spectacular scenes of dancing. For those of you persuaded dancing is a spiritual activity – and I know there are plenty of you – the novel has some very moving scenes of the connection dance allows. Said by one extremely bad and energetic dancer.

Oh it does have extraordinary good writing.

Should you read it? I don’t know? Maybe? Probably so you can be hip and pretend like you weren’t floored by the scene X Y and Z – all extreme and all intense. Actually that’s a good enough reason – read it because rare to find a book that makes you feel this much, even (especially?) when that feeling is surprise, disgust, desire, lust, shock – all from reading! Books, man. They are something else.

Leave a comment

Filed under Fiction, National Book Award

The Wren, the Wren: It might be brilliant; it might be boring

Honestly? I’m not sure. There were moments reading Anne Enright’s The Wren, the Wren that I was convinced it was genius. Sublime writing that catches you and holds you. Simple thematic question – what do we owe our inheritance, what do we blame the fathers and men. Rich, rich, imagery and poetry and playful form.

And then moments where I just didn’t care very much what happened to the characters, or couldn’t remember who a character was talking to or why, or whether an image was meant to be Significant or whether it was just there to prove the great writing.

I could let it percolate another few days and maybe I’d be clearer. But I think if I do the likelihood I forget the book entirely is high. There’s just not much there to hang on to; instead, a lot of imagery, a lot of certainty it is Very Beautiful Writing.

So sure – it won the Booker, and – as I Keep On Saying – it’s quite beautiful. And there are scenes I think might haunt me. But would I recommend it? Goddddd. I just don’t know.

Leave a comment

Filed under Booker Prize, Fiction

Long Island: Bets on the ending

Put Colm Tóibín’s Long Island in your library cart and you won’t be disappointed when it (eventually) makes it to you (I say eventually because inevitably it will have a wait list as everyone wants to read this one).

*many spoilers ahead*

It’s probably because I’d just finished the Elizabeth Strout, but the style of this one read as similar. Direct, descriptive of character’s thoughts, weighted moments that are not Literary – just excellent, and the interweaving of characters from previous works. Pressed I’d say I liked Strout better, but it would be hard pressed.

Long Island opens with a knock at the door. Eilis opens it to learn that her husband, Tony, has been having an affair. The woman he’s been sleeping with is pregnant, and her husband is at the door to explain that when the baby is born he will be dropping it off with Tony. And for some reason Tony thinks Eilis should go along with this plan. All of Tony’s family seems to think the same. Eilis is not so keen.

So off she goes (home?) to Ireland, bringing her grown children with her. With the unanswered question of whether she’ll return, and if she does return, if she’ll stay with Tony. She makes it seem like it’s his choice – like if he takes in the baby she won’t, and if he doesn’t, she will – but the reader knows (even if Eilis doesn’t) that this will always be her choice. Tony is not a choice maker.

Complications abound when she returns to Ireland. Her mother’s ailing health. Her former flame, Jim Farrel – now engaged to her best friend (but secretly!). Her adult children and what they want and expect from her.

How she can make a choice when so many people Expect So Much of her. What choices are hers, in the end. Well, that is the ending, and it’s a cliff hanger, so buckle up your book club and let everyone have their say.

For me? I want Eilis and Jim together on Long Island. And I want it to be a world where what Eilis wants she can choose. Want, we know, isn’t always get.

Delightful, great writing, absorbing (make it past the first 30 pages) and heart-full. Romance? I don’t know I’d call it that – stop slinging around genre words like you need them. Just read it, ok?

2 Comments

Filed under Book Club, Fiction, Prize Winner