I read first Megan O’Gieblyn’s God Human Animal Machine a few years ago, but returned to it this summer for another go. Rare, now, are the books I read twice and I came back to this non-fiction (!) work on the nature of consciousness and the religious dimensions of technology because in the first go-round I wasn’t sure I reached the end sure of what O’Gieblyn is arguing about what makes humans human and AI AI. Second time around and I think it’s just as fuzzy because O’Gieblyn is much more a cartographer of the philosophy of consciousness than she is a polemic writer; the argument – consciousness is something between the subject and the world – slippery for this reader to firmly hold.
What does seem ever more true of this reading in 2025 is the way in which the recent advances in AI force questions on the nature of concisousness, on who and what can claim it – as well as the intersections of technology with these ever-more slippery ideas of soul or life before-after-beyond death.
Should you be a reader wary of a dense book of philosophy: be not afraid. O’Gieblyn writes a charming first person narrative that interweaves her background in fundamentalist Christianity, her journey away from faith, her experience of addiction, and her continued questioning in ways that make the moments of exposition on the philosophy of Descartes read as a charming side quest (rather then, as they are, the heart of understanding the challenge Descartes’ disenchantment of the world has posed).
Of the many fantastic threads in the book – the interconnection of trees/mushrooms/the internet; the sentience of robot dogs; the way a profound question can unsettle our sense of identity as much as any drug – the one I found most lasting was the parallels O’Gieblyn draws between the story of Job and that of the all-knowing algorithm. Though the section is a departure, a bit, from the sections on what it is to know or constitute or explain or recognize a self (I-Thou!) it nevertheless does a spectacular job of demonstrating the rich, varied and embedded ways technology can be read through religious texts and – more importantly – religious questions. What rights do we humans have to question the all-knowing? What audacity do we have to ask ‘why’?
Anyway – it’s prompted a whole series of other readings and re-readings, so enjoy (or don’t) the next reviews on the spirituality of AI.
Literary Vice 