Tag Archives: writing

The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet: AI in Space

I didn’t include this one in my roundup of books I’ve read about AI lately, but it could fit. Becky Chambers wrote The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet in 2014 and like so much good sci-fi it anticipates the questions and issues that come to matter as technology changes and humans adapt (or don’t) to those changes.

What interested me in the book was not (though M. may be disappointed to learn of it) the questions of AI sentience, embodiment, identity and rights (and I’m not sure those questions were explored with sufficient nuance – though I’m promised the second book in the series does more), but rather the ideas of family and belonging – and what is owed and required of filial relationships.

We get to these ideas by way of the Wayfarer’s crew and their relationships with one another. The Wayfarer, a long-haul tunnelling ship (at one point the reader gets an explanation of space tunnelling that I gather must make sense but I glossed over because it was too much physics and not enough anything else) plays host to an interspecies crew, each with motley (and often fraught) backstories and species-specific uniqueness. Toward the end of the book one of the tech’s, Kizzy, explains why her crew-mate, Jenks doesn’t need to thank her for helping him. Her explanation is something about why Jenks as her brother (not by biology but by choice) can’t ever get rid of her, that their relationship, unlike a romantic one, is resilient and enduring (though I take exception to her framing of a sibling relationship as not needing work or gratitude). Like so many chosen-families, the Wayfarer crew each find moments in the narrative to explain to the reader why and how they have come to the ship and to the other crew members as those they choose to spend not just time with, but to build family. Lest the reader miss this meaning, Sissix, the Aandrisk character who, as a function of her species, intentionally chooses different kinds of families over the course of her life, explains in somewhat pedantic terms the absurdity of assuming that birth equates family and the idea that instead family is a function of care and of need.

I don’t read enough science fiction to know if this is an exceptionally good or exceptionally average representation of the genre, but I enjoyed it. With an ending that felt neatly wrapped – and sufficiently open for a sequel – it did leave this reader with some hope for our earthly-human future. A feeling of hope that, given everything else you might be reading today, may be sufficient reason to pick it up.

Leave a comment

Filed under Fiction

Bel Canto: I may be tone deaf, but I know good writing.

The only thing I remember from first year English is a lecture that argued that all creative writing (whether poetry or prose) is about the urge by authors to create something which will outlast them. That every poem or story is, in the end, a valiant gesture toward immortality. And that readers should read with an eye to the way the author intentionally and accidentally imbues their work with this impulse; that is, that the discerning reader will always be able to find evidence of the author’s vanity, of their arrogance in thinking their work will endure. At the time I found the argument moving and persuasive. Since then I think back on it more as an example of excellent teaching, it was a well paced lecture with convincing examples and analysis. Which isn’t to say I now thinking writing isn’t about immortality, just that I haven’t had cause to declare an allegiance in the great What is Writing For debate of humanity.  Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under American literature, Fiction, Orange Prize

My Name Is Lucy Barton: In which I retract my claim about writers in New York.

I deserved this book. After all my whinging about how all books set in New York about writers were/are terrible, I read Elizabeth Strout’s My Name is Lucy Barton and find myself retracting that outrageous and essentializing claim. Instead let’s agree that almost all books set in New York about writers are terrible – one exception is this one. Which is terrific. Really. Continue reading

3 Comments

Filed under American literature, Fiction

The Nest: You’ve Already Read This Book; or, On Doubting Your Memory Because This Book is So Unoriginal and Terrible

Three chapters in to Cynthia D’Aprix Sweeney’s The Nest I checked the publication date (2016) and decided no, despite the nagging feeling, I hadn’t read the book before. Four chapters in I checked this site to be absolutely sure I hadn’t read it before. I have been known to forget things like books I’ve read (or meetings, or words, or…) on occasion constantly. Trusty site confirmed that it was a “new” read.  Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Bestseller, Fiction, Funny